There are 2 thoughts on “Second Nephi as a Legal Document”.

  1. Unexpected update:
    Pending formal publication and analysis, it appears a Neo-Assyrian seal from the First Temple period was found near the Western Wall. Despite being a Neo-Assyrian seal in Israel it also appears Paleo-Hebrew was added after initial manufacture (differing quality of engraving). The lettering is also mirrored so the imprint would be legible.

    Altogether this supports my articles’ use of Neo-Babylonian and Assyrian legal conventions as at least a surrogate for the legal conventions occurring within Judah in the First Temple period.

    If confirmed, the discovery of Neo-Assyrian legal artifacts within Judah make it hard to imagine Neo-Assyrian legal procedure and rhetoric completely absent.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/extremely-rare-beautiful-first-temple-era-genie-seal-discovered-in-jerusalem/

  2. I had not heard this concept or “manner of prophecy” previously. To juxtapose unrelated prophecies in the same document order to validate them seems like a reasonable strategy. I just saw this in Helaman 8:20… perhaps it is an example.

    “…and Jeremiah
    A (Jeremiah being that same prophet who testified
    B of the destruction of Jerusalem)
    B and now we know that Jerusalem was destroyed
    A according to the words of Jeremiah. (chiasmus)
    O then why not the Son of God come, according to his prophecy?”

    I would be happy to know of other straight forward examples if you have them. Thanks

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

All comments are moderated to ensure respectful discourse. It is assumed that it is possible to disagree agreeably and intelligently and comments that intend to increase overall understanding are particularly encouraged. Individual authors are given the option to disallow commenting or end commenting after a certain period at their discretion.

Close this window

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This